Job boards and applicant tracking systems
The appeal of applicant tracking systems (ATS) for employers is obvious: they promise to bring order to the often disordered process of managing job applicants. An ATS can theoretically drive all job applicants into a single pipeline, massage their unruly information into neatly ordered database fields set up exactly as the employer desires, and allow HR to actually manage the interactions with applicants.
Sometimes the ATS works well – and sometimes (like all software) it doesn’t. When it works, the HR and recruitment team are very happy and often are able to do more with less. (Although poor ATS implementations can cause problems for job seekers, as I noted here).
Job boards, however, face several challenges when dealing with employers using an ATS:
- Technical integration: when a job seeker views a job on the job site and then decides to apply, there has to be a ‘hand off’ from the job site to the ATS. Usually this is simply a redirect to a specific ATS URL – but not always. A poor hand off can result in ‘dropped’ job seeker applications – and an unhappy employer.
- Source recognition: Ask any job board operator and you’ll quickly find this is the number one complaint against ATS vendors: they can be ineffective at recognizing the source of an application. Thus, your job board may show that 50 people applied for a particular job…but the ATS only recognizes 5 applications from your board. What happened to the other 45? Some drop out because of the actual ATS questions and structure; others don’t mark their ‘source’ correctly. Some ATS vendors automatically recognize the source – this is good. But many rely instead on the job seeker – who is in a hurry, anxious to get through the application, and not awfully worried about accuracy of the source picked from a drop-down list.
There are, unfortunately, no easy solutions. However, as a job board operator, you can prevent problems by ensuring that your job board software is flexible and built with the expectation of ATS integration, and by working closely with the employer and ATS vendor during the set up and testing phase. Don’t assume that the reporting is accurate – verify it independently. Remember – ATS is not going away, and your board’s ability to work with an ATS will have a huge impact on your long term success.
[Want to get Job Board Doctor posts via email? Subscribe here.]. [Check out the JobBoardGeek podcast archive!]This Post Has 3 Comments
Comments are closed.
I would argue that it is possible to achieve this. Simply select an ATS that is strong in job disctribution, or that partners with or better still, is fully integrated with a leading job distribution system. In the UK, Europe and US you should be looking out for ATS systems that work with Broadbean..
I agree and also an online eRecruitment ATS system that will enhance the way you do your recruitment and streamline the process, reduce time-to-hire and is easy to use will always be a big plus for recruiters.
This is a great article. I work for a job board company that has just launched and ATS system within its job board capability (www.birddogjobs.com). It incorporates a job distribution tool, complete resume searching capability, candidate tracking/ranking/notes and EEO tracking for government mandated diversity requirements. It can capture job seekers from walk-ins, company website, job board advertising, etc. This kind of approach is great for those companies that don’t have the resources to invest in the large ATS systems but still want to easily track their applicants, store their applicants and search their applicants at any time.