Life after job postings
I was discussing Indeed with some other folks at the JobG8 conference (what a surprise, right?), and one person made a comment that really stuck with me.
“Google can wreck Indeed’s business anytime they want, simply by changing their search algorithms.”
Yes, that’s always been true. And up to this point, Google hasn’t chosen to do so. They’ve instead been quite happy to take Indeed’s (and all other aggregators and job boards) money. That may change. It may not. But for me, it really underscored another fact.
Job postings are commodities. They are everywhere and there are companies in the market that are continually driving down the value of these postings. That’s just the way it is (and has been for at least 3 or 4 years).
Yet many job boards still act as if job postings are not commodities (which, by definition, tend to be low margin). They see themselves as they always were: sites that sell job postings.
But it’s true, you may respond. Look at my site! I’m getting 80% of my revenue from job postings!!
Well…I’m here to tell you that your days are numbered. You’re getting 80% of your revenue from a commodity – and you are on a race to the bottom.
Smart job boards realized this years ago. They began migrating from ‘we sell job postings’ to ‘we sell access to targeted, interested candidates’. Why? Because (a) it was true, and (b) it was more profitable. If everyone is selling job postings, but you’re selling candidate access, you’re the one that’s different – the one that employers seek out. (And please note: I’m not saying that you should dump job postings – as a commodity, everyone needs them – just don’t depend on them to help you thrive).
LinkedIn played this card to perfection (we’ll see what happens now that they are in Microsoft’s embrace). Plenty of niche sites have done this as well, adding new/old ways to reach candidates like targeted emails, career fairs, prescreened and vetted candidate shortlists, company videos, and more. Why are they offering all of these non-job-posting products?
Because they aren’t in the business of selling job postings. They’re in the business of selling candidate access.
Don’t get in a down-market race to sell a commodity. Even if Google pulls the plug on Indeed, there will be plenty of other companies that are happy to play in that commodity market.
Grow your revenue by focusing on your candidates. It’s really that simple.
[Want to get Job Board Doctor posts via email? Subscribe here.]. [Check out the JobBoardGeek podcast archive!]This Post Has 4 Comments
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
While a little scary, it is fascinating how much control Google potentially has over the online recruiting industry. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were to add a “jobs” search tab at some point, the same way you can search for images or news.
Considering that it looks like Indeed is moving into offering recruiting services, maybe they’re already bracing themselves against upheaval caused by the next big search algorithm changes? That move also kinda parallels job boards diversifying their offerings.
Every job board had the Google threat hanging over them, even before Indeed came along. Every job board owner will have pondered what would happen if Google launched into our sector. I think now technology has advanced enough that they could make it happen.
The most interesting move for me is that job boards offer staffing agency services, similar to Indeed Prime. That is certainly a promising scenario.
[…] are designed with Google search algorithms in mind. But what happens when those algorithms change? Job Board Doctor suggests that it’s a potential disaster in the […]
[…] One of the strongest arguments for a candidate-first strategy is that ads are commodities whose value could change any time. At least according to the Job Board Doctor. […]