Too Big to Niche? LinkedIn Goes Freelance.

LinkedIn, the career-oriented social platform best known for being a repository of resumes and stiff headshots, has dipped its toes into the niche territory of freelancing, as seen with the expansion of its Services Marketplace. It’s quite the strategic pivot for a platform that has long positioned itself as a catch-all for professional networking. But now, as LinkedIn forays deeper into specialized job functions and gig-based work, the question arises: can LinkedIn truly compete in the world of hyper-relevant, niche job sites?

Let’s begin with the obvious. As of this week, LinkedIn has amassed 10 million freelancers, a remarkable feat when considering the drop-off seen in other gig platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. However, just amassing freelancers does not automatically translate to success in the crowded world of niche job platforms, where hyper-relevant content is king and specialized services reign supreme.

Niche job sites have long dominated specific verticals—think platforms focused on tech gigs, legal consulting, or creative work like design. These sites thrive on offering a curated, highly relevant selection of job postings, tailored to exacting professional communities. LinkedIn, by contrast, has traditionally operated as a broad-spectrum platform that serves everyone from C-suite executives to interns. Now, with its foray into freelancing, LinkedIn is entering a space that demands an intense focus on precision—where simply having millions of users is not enough.

The strength of niche platforms lies in their ability to serve up laser-focused, relevant content. Freelancers on platforms like Dribbble or Toptal, for example, find themselves surrounded by opportunities and peers that match their specific skills and interests. The hyper-relevant job listings, content, and networking available on these platforms foster deep engagement. LinkedIn’s model, by contrast, is inherently more diluted. While it boasts immense scale, offering freelancers a generalist platform where one minute you’re seeing updates about blockchain and the next you’re reading someone’s “thought leadership” post about mindfulness, it lacks the focused ecosystem niche players provide.

Moreover, specialized job platforms often cultivate not just jobs but communities of practice, where freelancers can learn, grow, and engage with peers in meaningful ways. LinkedIn’s algorithm-driven feed does little to match this focused interaction, as it attempts to be all things to all people. LinkedIn’s pivot into the freelancing market does promise more service requests, averaging eight per minute, but quantity does not necessarily indicate quality. Freelancers looking for jobs with specific expectations, such as a preference for high-end design work or data science projects, may find themselves drowning in irrelevant content.

To maintain relevance and stop being a generic job board, LinkedIn will need to lean heavily into personalization and sector-specific focus. Only then can it hope to attract the right buyers—and more importantly—give freelancers the kind of hyper-focused content that drives success on niche platforms. Its sheer user base alone won’t be enough in a market increasingly dominated by hyper-relevant, highly-specialized work environments.

[Want to get Job Board Doctor posts via email? Subscribe here.]